Independent profileReviewed Aug 26, 2026

CommonMind

A Boston agency founded in 2001 and now focused on vertical SaaS growth through SEO, content, paid acquisition, HubSpot operations and pipeline measurement.

Boston, MABest for Vertical SaaS companies and lean marketing teams that need search, content and demand generation connected to CRM pipeline

Hub Score v2.0

74/100

Developing public profile

Top 10%

A narrower capability profile; compare buyer fit and Evidence Confidence.

Ranks #34 of 399 listed United States companies.

Entry retainer

$4k/mo

123% above peer median; confirm current scope

Operating history

0 years

At peer median

Documented breadth

7 services

3 industry categories

Evidence confidence

100% · High

299 comparable industry peers

Website traffic

No public estimate

HypeStat · Checked 26 Aug 2026

Traffic context: No defensible current public traffic estimate was recorded for this domain; this field is display-only and does not affect Hub Score. Traffic is display-only and does not affect Hub Score.

Open HypeStat source

Buyer decision brief

Where the public evidence points

CommonMind qualifies through a current Boston office, explicit 2001 founding, eight named current team members, a detailed vertical-SaaS search offering, public monthly program pricing and a strong named case library. The displayed $4,000 amount is the Signal growth program and bundles SEO with content, AI visibility, HubSpot and reporting. All outcomes are first-party and several engagements combine organic, paid, conversion and marketing-operations work.

Current official pages publish a Boston address, 2001 founding and eight-person team roster

The live pricing page publishes a $4,000 monthly program with SEO and AI-search visibility

Named cases report organic traffic, rankings, traffic value, revenue and pipeline outcomes

Relative context

How CommonMind compares

Compared with 299 United States profiles sharing at least one documented industry.

MeasureCompanyPeer median
Entry retainer floor$4k/mo$1.8k/mo
Years operating0Not published
Hub Score v2.07462
Evidence confidence100%95%

Peer comparisons are computed from the current directory dataset, not external market estimates.

Documented services

Linked capabilities are included only when documented in the company research record.

Documented industries

Industry inclusion signals public experience, not exclusive specialisation.

Verified profile evidence

Products and operating claims

First-party case evidence

Published client outcomes

Not independently audited

Transparent scoring

Why Hub Score v2.0 is 74

Operating resilience

3/15

3 points under 3 years; 6 at 3-5; 9 at 6-10; 11 at 11-15; 13 at 16-20; 15 at 21+ years.

Delivery capability

25/25

A monotonic diminishing-return curve: 1 service = 6, 2 = 10, 3 = 14, 4 = 17, 5 = 20, 6 = 22, 7+ = 25.

Sector evidence

23/25

Industry coverage contributes 10, 14, 16 or 18 points; 1, 2 or 3+ source-linked case studies add 3, 5 or 7 points.

Commercial clarity

20/20

4 for a live site + 6 for a disclosed entry floor + 5 for a stated pricing model + 5 for a specific best-fit client statement.

Delivery capacity

3/15

Team bands map monotonically: 10-20 = 5, 20-50 = 8, 50-150 = 11, 150-250 = 13, 250-500 or 500+ = 15.

The five capability factors total exactly 100. Evidence Confidence is calculated and displayed separately. See sources, guardrails and formulas →

Questions for the sales call

  • Confirm which SEO, content, AI-visibility, HubSpot and reporting deliverables fit the $4,000 Signal tier and what requires a higher program or separate budget.
  • Request Search Console, analytics, CRM and billing evidence for a comparable SaaS company with organic, paid, brand, conversion and market effects separated.
  • Confirm which of the eight named people will work on the account, their allocation, content and link process, month-to-month cancellation terms and ownership of systems and data.

What this profile does not prove

  • The $4,000 tier is an integrated growth program rather than a standardized SEO-only retainer.
  • All outcomes are company-authored; OpenAsset combines organic, paid and ABM, while Swag.com also includes performance and conversion work.
  • Eight named people supports company-wide capacity only and does not prove how many specialists are available to a new account.