Independent profileReviewed Aug 26, 2026

AdShark

A Fargo digital agency founded in 2013 with 19 people identified on its current about page, offering technical, local and ecommerce SEO alongside paid media, web, email and conversion work.

Fargo, NDBest for Ecommerce and regional brands seeking organic search coordinated with paid acquisition, web development, email and conversion work from a Fargo team

Hub Score v2.0

67/100

Developing public profile

Top 30%

A narrower capability profile; compare buyer fit and Evidence Confidence.

Tied #83 with 30 other companies of 399 listed United States companies.

Entry retainer

Not published

No recurring floor published; confirm current scope

Operating history

0 years

At peer median

Documented breadth

8 services

5 industry categories

Evidence confidence

98% · High

371 comparable industry peers

Website traffic

No public estimate

HypeStat · Checked 26 Aug 2026

Traffic context: No defensible current public traffic estimate was recorded for this domain; this field is display-only and does not affect Hub Score. Traffic is display-only and does not affect Hub Score.

Open HypeStat source

Buyer decision brief

Where the public evidence points

AdShark qualifies through a current Fargo office, an official 2013 founding, a current about-page count of 19 people and multiple company-authored search cases. The 10-20 capacity band follows that current first-party count rather than a marketplace estimate. Its strongest organic cases are older, and broader current outcomes combine SEO with paid, web and conversion work. No exact current comparable SEO minimum was found, so pricing remains unscored.

Current Fargo office

Official history supports a 2013 founding

Current about page reports 19 team members

Relative context

How AdShark compares

Compared with 371 United States profiles sharing at least one documented industry.

MeasureCompanyPeer median
Entry retainer floorNot published$1.5k/mo
Years operating0Not published
Hub Score v2.06760
Evidence confidence98%95%

Peer comparisons are computed from the current directory dataset, not external market estimates.

Documented services

Linked capabilities are included only when documented in the company research record.

Documented industries

Industry inclusion signals public experience, not exclusive specialisation.

Verified profile evidence

Products and operating claims

First-party case evidence

Published client outcomes

Not independently audited

Transparent scoring

Why Hub Score v2.0 is 67

Operating resilience

3/15

3 points under 3 years; 6 at 3-5; 9 at 6-10; 11 at 11-15; 13 at 16-20; 15 at 21+ years.

Delivery capability

25/25

A monotonic diminishing-return curve: 1 service = 6, 2 = 10, 3 = 14, 4 = 17, 5 = 20, 6 = 22, 7+ = 25.

Sector evidence

25/25

Industry coverage contributes 10, 14, 16 or 18 points; 1, 2 or 3+ source-linked case studies add 3, 5 or 7 points.

Commercial clarity

9/20

4 for a live site + 6 for a disclosed entry floor + 5 for a stated pricing model + 5 for a specific best-fit client statement.

Delivery capacity

5/15

Team bands map monotonically: 10-20 = 5, 20-50 = 8, 50-150 = 11, 150-250 = 13, 250-500 or 500+ = 15.

The five capability factors total exactly 100. Evidence Confidence is calculated and displayed separately. See sources, guardrails and formulas →

Questions for the sales call

  • Request read-only Search Console, analytics and ecommerce or lead data for a comparable current engagement, with absolute baselines and date windows.
  • Confirm the named delivery team, monthly capacity and division of technical SEO, content, paid media, web and conversion responsibilities.
  • Obtain a current line-item proposal separating recurring SEO from content, development, email, paid media, software and media spend.

What this profile does not prove

  • No exact current recurring SEO minimum is public.
  • All selected outcomes are company-authored, not independently audited, and the most SEO-specific cases are older.
  • The Elevate case mixes organic, paid-search and paid-social outcomes, so channel-level incrementality requires buyer-side validation.