Independent profileReviewed Aug 26, 2026

Horton Group

A Nashville digital agency operating since 1996, combining SEO and AI-search visibility with content, paid media, web development, CRM integration and ongoing support.

Nashville, TNBest for Established Middle Tennessee organizations wanting search coordinated with websites, content, paid media, CRM and ongoing technical support

Hub Score v2.0

62/100

Limited public profile

Top 40%

The structured capability record is narrow; verify fit before shortlisting.

Tied #151 with 30 other companies of 399 listed United States companies.

Entry retainer

Not published

No recurring floor published; confirm current scope

Operating history

0 years

At peer median

Documented breadth

7 services

7 industry categories

Evidence confidence

98% · High

376 comparable industry peers

Website traffic

No public estimate

HypeStat · Checked 26 Aug 2026

Traffic context: No defensible current public traffic estimate was recorded for this domain; this field is display-only and does not affect Hub Score. Traffic is display-only and does not affect Hub Score.

Open HypeStat source

Buyer decision brief

Where the public evidence points

Horton Group qualifies through its current Nashville headquarters, official 1996 founding history, dedicated SEO and AI-search services, explicit in-house delivery statement and named Tennessee case material. Its public team graphic does not provide a text roster or exact count suitable for capacity scoring, and no recurring SEO floor is published. Outcomes are company-authored and generally integrate websites, content, paid or inbound work with search.

Nashville headquarters and 1996 founding history

Current site says delivery is full-time and in-house

Named Tennessee cases publish search and engagement outcomes

Relative context

How Horton Group compares

Compared with 376 United States profiles sharing at least one documented industry.

MeasureCompanyPeer median
Entry retainer floorNot published$1.5k/mo
Years operating0Not published
Hub Score v2.06260
Evidence confidence98%95%

Peer comparisons are computed from the current directory dataset, not external market estimates.

Documented services

Linked capabilities are included only when documented in the company research record.

Documented industries

Industry inclusion signals public experience, not exclusive specialisation.

Verified profile evidence

Products and operating claims

First-party case evidence

Published client outcomes

Not independently audited

Transparent scoring

Why Hub Score v2.0 is 62

Operating resilience

3/15

3 points under 3 years; 6 at 3-5; 9 at 6-10; 11 at 11-15; 13 at 16-20; 15 at 21+ years.

Delivery capability

25/25

A monotonic diminishing-return curve: 1 service = 6, 2 = 10, 3 = 14, 4 = 17, 5 = 20, 6 = 22, 7+ = 25.

Sector evidence

25/25

Industry coverage contributes 10, 14, 16 or 18 points; 1, 2 or 3+ source-linked case studies add 3, 5 or 7 points.

Commercial clarity

9/20

4 for a live site + 6 for a disclosed entry floor + 5 for a stated pricing model + 5 for a specific best-fit client statement.

Delivery capacity

0/15

Team bands map monotonically: 10-20 = 5, 20-50 = 8, 50-150 = 11, 150-250 = 13, 250-500 or 500+ = 15.

The five capability factors total exactly 100. Evidence Confidence is calculated and displayed separately. See sources, guardrails and formulas →

Questions for the sales call

  • Request read-only Search Console, analytics and CRM evidence for a comparable current account, including dates, absolute baselines and organic-versus-paid attribution.
  • Confirm the named in-house strategist, technical, content, development and paid specialists, monthly hours and current client load.
  • Obtain a line-item proposal separating SEO, AI-search work, content, directories, web, CRM, paid-media management, media spend, software, term and ownership.

What this profile does not prove

  • The current site does not publish a dependable text roster, exact employee count or recurring SEO minimum.
  • All selected outcomes are company-authored and have not been independently audited.
  • Two cases are historical, one is anonymous, and all combine search with website, content, inbound or paid work.