Fannit
A Seattle and Phoenix contractor-marketing agency founded in 2010, integrating local SEO, websites, advertising, reviews, automation and attribution.
Hub Score v2.0
59/100
Limited public profile
Top 60%The structured capability record is narrow; verify fit before shortlisting.
Tied #206 with 21 other companies of 399 listed United States companies.
Entry retainer
Not published
No recurring floor published; confirm current scope
Operating history
0 years
At peer median
Documented breadth
8 services
1 industry categories
Evidence confidence
98% · High
231 comparable industry peers
Website traffic
No public estimate
HypeStat · Checked 26 Aug 2026
Traffic context: No defensible current public traffic estimate was recorded for this domain; this field is display-only and does not affect Hub Score. Traffic is display-only and does not affect Hub Score.
Open HypeStat sourceBuyer decision brief
Where the public evidence points
Fannit qualifies through its current Seattle operating base, official 2010 history, contractor-specific search system and many named revenue and lead outcomes. The complete workforce and actual service price are unavailable because the live pricing page currently errors in public rendering. Its highlighted revenue cases represent integrated marketing systems and do not isolate SEO contribution.
Current Seattle operating base
Official 2010 founding record
Named contractor outcomes tied to revenue and lead generation
Relative context
How Fannit compares
Compared with 231 United States profiles sharing at least one documented industry.
| Measure | Company | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Entry retainer floor | Not published | $1k/mo |
| Years operating | 0 | Not published |
| Hub Score v2.0 | 59 | 60 |
| Evidence confidence | 98% | 95% |
Peer comparisons are computed from the current directory dataset, not external market estimates.
Documented services
Linked capabilities are included only when documented in the company research record.
Documented industries
Industry inclusion signals public experience, not exclusive specialisation.
Verified profile evidence
Products and operating claims
Seattle operating base
Current location pages and the site footer identify Seattle, Washington and Phoenix, Arizona as operating bases.
Fannit Seattle local SEO
Founded in 2010
The current homepage and footer publish 2010 as Fannit's founding year.
Fannit homepage
Named founders; full count not published
Current pages identify co-founders Keith and Neil Eneix and a dedicated-strategist model but do not expose a complete workforce total.
Fannit homepage
Contractor local search system
Current services include technical and on-page SEO, Google Business Profile, citations, content, links and monthly reporting.
Fannit Seattle local SEO
Websites, ads, reviews and automation
The integrated offer adds web design, Google and social ads, reputation, lead automation and marketing leadership.
Fannit homepage
No usable public service floor
The homepage links to pricing, but the current public pricing route returns a dynamic-module error and exposes no dependable amount.
Fannit pricing
First-party case evidence
Published client outcomes
Clean Crawls
Reported $8.5 million in revenue growth
Named company-authored integrated contractor-marketing result highlighted on the homepage. No public period, baseline or SEO-only attribution is provided.
Open sourceOn the Go Moving & Storage
Reported an 823% return on investment
Named company-authored integrated result highlighted on the homepage. Scope, period and calculation details are not public.
Open sourceNew Life Rockeries
Reported $1.3 million in revenue growth
Named company-authored client outcome and testimonial. The public summary does not isolate SEO from the wider marketing system.
Open sourceTransparent scoring
Why Hub Score v2.0 is 59
Operating resilience
3/153 points under 3 years; 6 at 3-5; 9 at 6-10; 11 at 11-15; 13 at 16-20; 15 at 21+ years.
Delivery capability
25/25A monotonic diminishing-return curve: 1 service = 6, 2 = 10, 3 = 14, 4 = 17, 5 = 20, 6 = 22, 7+ = 25.
Sector evidence
17/25Industry coverage contributes 10, 14, 16 or 18 points; 1, 2 or 3+ source-linked case studies add 3, 5 or 7 points.
Commercial clarity
14/204 for a live site + 6 for a disclosed entry floor + 5 for a stated pricing model + 5 for a specific best-fit client statement.
Delivery capacity
0/15Team bands map monotonically: 10-20 = 5, 20-50 = 8, 50-150 = 11, 150-250 = 13, 250-500 or 500+ = 15.
The five capability factors total exactly 100. Evidence Confidence is calculated and displayed separately. See sources, guardrails and formulas →
Questions for the sales call
- Request read-only Search Console, analytics and CRM evidence for a current comparable account, including dates, absolute baselines and qualified outcomes.
- Confirm the named strategist, technical, content, link and analytics staff, monthly hours, current client load and any subcontracted work.
- Obtain a line-item proposal separating SEO, content, links, web or CRO work, paid-media management, media spend, software, term and asset ownership.
What this profile does not prove
- The complete workforce and comparable SEO floor are not publicly available; the pricing page currently errors.
- All highlighted outcomes are company-authored homepage summaries without public raw analytics.
- The results cover integrated websites, SEO, ads, reputation and automation, so they do not prove isolated organic-search performance.