Ascedia
A Milwaukee digital agency founded in 2000, uniting SEO and content strategy with UX, application development, enterprise CMS work and analytics.
Hub Score v2.0
64/100
Limited public profile
Top 40%The structured capability record is narrow; verify fit before shortlisting.
Tied #130 with 16 other companies of 399 listed United States companies.
Entry retainer
Not published
No recurring floor published; confirm current scope
Operating history
0 years
At peer median
Documented breadth
6 services
5 industry categories
Evidence confidence
98% · High
294 comparable industry peers
Website traffic
No public estimate
HypeStat · Checked 26 Aug 2026
Traffic context: No defensible current public traffic estimate was recorded for this domain; this field is display-only and does not affect Hub Score. Traffic is display-only and does not affect Hub Score.
Open HypeStat sourceBuyer decision brief
Where the public evidence points
Ascedia qualifies through its current Milwaukee office, official 2000 founding, active SEO capability and named cases across professional services, education and tourism. The complete workforce and recurring floor are not public. Several current case templates render metric values as zero in public text, requiring direct verification before use.
Current Milwaukee office
Official 2000 founding history
Named cases cover organic search, content authority and post-launch traffic
Relative context
How Ascedia compares
Compared with 294 United States profiles sharing at least one documented industry.
| Measure | Company | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Entry retainer floor | Not published | $1.8k/mo |
| Years operating | 0 | Not published |
| Hub Score v2.0 | 64 | 62 |
| Evidence confidence | 98% | 97% |
Peer comparisons are computed from the current directory dataset, not external market estimates.
Documented services
Linked capabilities are included only when documented in the company research record.
Documented industries
Industry inclusion signals public experience, not exclusive specialisation.
Verified profile evidence
Products and operating claims
Milwaukee office
Current pages publish 161 S 1st Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53204.
Ascedia contact
Founded in 2000
The official 25th-anniversary page states that Ascedia was founded in 2000.
Ascedia anniversary
Hybrid multidisciplinary team; count not published
Current pages describe strategy, marketing, design and development roles but no complete workforce count.
Ascedia about
Technical and content SEO
Current cases document audits, metadata, internal linking, schema, content gaps, backlinks and topical-authority programs.
Ascedia RubinBrown
Enterprise design and technology
The broader offer combines strategy, digital marketing, UX, application development and enterprise CMS delivery.
Ascedia about
No public SEO floor
Current pages publish no comparable recurring SEO minimum.
Ascedia contact
First-party case evidence
Published client outcomes
RubinBrown
Reported increases in organic sessions, organic keywords, referring domains and AI Overview clicks since mid-2024
Named company-authored SEO case; the public text currently renders percentage values as 0%, so exact gains require direct verification.
Open sourceDairy Farmers of Wisconsin
Reported first-year increases in organic search, direct and referral traffic
Named company-authored website case; the public text currently omits usable percentage values.
Open sourceUW-Madison School of Business
Reported increased organic traffic to the undergraduate program and more traffic from new users
Named company-authored redesign, development, accessibility and performance case; numeric values are not usable in public rendering.
Open sourceTransparent scoring
Why Hub Score v2.0 is 64
Operating resilience
3/153 points under 3 years; 6 at 3-5; 9 at 6-10; 11 at 11-15; 13 at 16-20; 15 at 21+ years.
Delivery capability
22/25A monotonic diminishing-return curve: 1 service = 6, 2 = 10, 3 = 14, 4 = 17, 5 = 20, 6 = 22, 7+ = 25.
Sector evidence
25/25Industry coverage contributes 10, 14, 16 or 18 points; 1, 2 or 3+ source-linked case studies add 3, 5 or 7 points.
Commercial clarity
14/204 for a live site + 6 for a disclosed entry floor + 5 for a stated pricing model + 5 for a specific best-fit client statement.
Delivery capacity
0/15Team bands map monotonically: 10-20 = 5, 20-50 = 8, 50-150 = 11, 150-250 = 13, 250-500 or 500+ = 15.
The five capability factors total exactly 100. Evidence Confidence is calculated and displayed separately. See sources, guardrails and formulas →
Questions for the sales call
- Request read-only Search Console, analytics and CRM evidence for a current comparable account, including dates, absolute baselines and qualified outcomes.
- Confirm the named strategist, technical, content, link, development and analytics staff, monthly hours, client load and any subcontracted work.
- Obtain a line-item proposal separating SEO, content, links, web or CRO work, paid-media management, media spend, software, term and asset ownership.
What this profile does not prove
- The complete workforce and comparable recurring SEO floor are not public.
- All selected outcomes are company-authored and combine SEO with website or broader digital work.
- Current case templates render key percentage fields as 0% or omit them, so no exact metric should be relied on without raw evidence.