Independent profileReviewed Aug 23, 2026

Jebilton Ventures

A Nairobi agency focused on SMEs, startups and NGOs, with public KES retainers, defined keyword and content deliverables, and a three-month minimum for SEO packages.

Nairobi, 047Best for Nairobi SMEs, startups and NGOs that need an accessible, scoped SEO retainer

Hub Score v2.0

71/100

Developing public profile

Top 10%

A narrower capability profile; compare buyer fit and Evidence Confidence.

Tied #1 with 1 other company of 86 listed Kenya companies.

Entry retainer

KES 15k/mo

28% above peer median; confirm current scope

Operating history

0 years

At peer median

Documented breadth

7 services

4 industry categories

Evidence confidence

85% · High

63 comparable industry peers

Website traffic

No public estimate

HypeStat · Checked 23 Aug 2026

Traffic context: HypeStat did not have a public traffic estimate for this domain when checked. Traffic is display-only and does not affect Hub Score.

Open HypeStat source

Buyer decision brief

Where the public evidence points

Jebilton has the clearest entry-level procurement path in the launch set. It publishes three SEO retainers, the keyword and content allocation inside each, a three-month minimum and an explicit focus on Nairobi SMEs, startups and NGOs. That makes it easy to shortlist on scope, but the site does not publish a current named headcount or independently verified outcome data, so buyers should validate delivery capacity and client evidence during procurement.

Publishes three monthly SEO tiers with specific deliverables

Local-search scope includes Google Business Profile and citation work

Clear SME, startup and nonprofit buyer focus

Relative context

How Jebilton Ventures compares

Compared with 63 Kenya profiles sharing at least one documented industry.

MeasureCompanyPeer median
Entry retainer floorKES 15k/moKES 11.8k/mo
Years operating0Not published
Hub Score v2.07150
Evidence confidence85%80%

Peer comparisons are computed from the current directory dataset, not external market estimates.

Documented services

Linked capabilities are included only when documented in the company research record.

Documented industries

Industry inclusion signals public experience, not exclusive specialisation.

Verified profile evidence

Products and operating claims

First-party case evidence

Published client outcomes

Not independently audited

Transparent scoring

Why Hub Score v2.0 is 71

Operating resilience

3/15

3 points under 3 years; 6 at 3-5; 9 at 6-10; 11 at 11-15; 13 at 16-20; 15 at 21+ years.

Delivery capability

25/25

A monotonic diminishing-return curve: 1 service = 6, 2 = 10, 3 = 14, 4 = 17, 5 = 20, 6 = 22, 7+ = 25.

Sector evidence

18/25

Industry coverage contributes 10, 14, 16 or 18 points; 1, 2 or 3+ source-linked case studies add 3, 5 or 7 points.

Commercial clarity

20/20

4 for a live site + 6 for a disclosed entry floor + 5 for a stated pricing model + 5 for a specific best-fit client statement.

Delivery capacity

5/15

Team bands map monotonically: 10-20 = 5, 20-50 = 8, 50-150 = 11, 150-250 = 13, 250-500 or 500+ = 15.

The five capability factors total exactly 100. Evidence Confidence is calculated and displayed separately. See sources, guardrails and formulas →

Questions for the sales call

  • Confirm which technical fixes are included rather than merely reported, and who implements changes on a non-WordPress site.
  • Ask for a current named delivery team because the public site describes a small team but does not publish a verifiable headcount roster.
  • Request an attributable case with baseline clicks, qualified enquiries and dates rather than a page-one ranking screenshot alone.

What this profile does not prove

  • The 10-20 team band is provisional because the public site does not publish a complete current roster; verify staffing before contracting.
  • The agency publishes first-party client and ranking claims, but no case met the directory's threshold for outcome evidence in this review.
  • Package prices and minimum terms should be reconfirmed on the final written proposal.