← All tools

Independent data · no sponsored positions

Compare SEO companies without opening twelve tabs

Put two to four companies on the same evidence grid. See where pricing, capacity, experience and proof actually differ—and which questions the public record still cannot answer.

Evidence confidence stays separate from capability

Every Hub Score factor remains visible

Selections stay in a shareable comparison URL

Companies to compare

Choose 2–4 from one market

Fast read

What separates this shortlist

These signals are calculated from published directory fields. They expose trade-offs; they do not automatically recommend a winner.

Highest Hub Score

Major Tom

Published operating capability—not a result guarantee.

Strongest evidence

Marwick Marketing · Major Tom

Research completeness, separate from capability.

Lowest published floor

Marwick Marketing

Entry point in CAD; not a quote.

Largest documented team

Major Tom

Team band does not prove account allocation.

Evidence comparison

Current directory snapshot

Vancouver, BC

Marwick Marketing

66/100

A BC agency built around local search and paid media for service businesses with a defined catchment area.

Open profile

Vancouver, BC

Major Tom

74/100

A full-service digital agency formed from established Canadian shops, working across Vancouver, Toronto and New York.

Open profile

Hub Score

Five published capability factors; no paid inputs.

66/100

74/100

Evidence confidence

Freshness and source coverage—not capability.

50% · Developing

Sources 0/25 · Cases 0/15

50% · Developing

Sources 0/25 · Cases 0/15

Published entry floor

Minimum engagement, not typical spend or a quote.

CA$3.5k/mo

Monthly retainer

CA$8k/mo

Monthly retainer

Delivery capacity

Published team band; confirm the people assigned.

20-50

50-150

Operating history

Unknown years remain unscored.

2013 · 0 years

2019 · 0 years

Published proof

First-party cases are not independently audited.

0 case outcomes

0 source-linked operating claims

0 case outcomes

0 source-linked operating claims

Best-fit signal

Editorial reading of the documented offer.

Local service businesses in Western Canada.

Brands running Canadian and US programmes together.

Shared fit

Capabilities every selected company documents.

Services

Technical SEOPaid MediaContent Marketing

Industries

No industry tag is shared by every company.

Documented differentiators

Marwick Marketing

Local SEO · Home Services · Legal · Healthcare · Real Estate

Major Tom

Enterprise SEO · Analytics · Conversion Optimization · Ecommerce · SaaS & Technology · Financial Services · Education

Transparent scoring

Where each Hub Score comes from

Full methodology →
FactorMarwick MarketingMajor Tom

Operating resilience

Maximum 15

3/153/15

Delivery capability

Maximum 25

17/2522/25

Sector evidence

Maximum 25

18/2518/25

Commercial clarity

Maximum 20

20/2020/20

Delivery capacity

Maximum 15

8/1511/15

What this comparison cannot decide

Public evidence cannot tell you who will be assigned, whether current capacity is available, how the agency will diagnose your site or what the final scope will cost. Use this page to narrow the questions—not to skip proposal review, references or contract diligence.

Score finalist proposals