Independent profileReviewed Aug 26, 2026

iPullRank

A New York City agency founded in 2014, combining enterprise technical SEO and content engineering with relevance engineering, generative-search strategy, measurement and authority work.

New York City, NYBest for Mid-market and enterprise organizations with complex technical, content and AI-search visibility problems that need research-led strategy plus implementation support

Hub Score v2.0

59/100

Limited public profile

Top 60%

The structured capability record is narrow; verify fit before shortlisting.

Tied #206 with 21 other companies of 399 listed United States companies.

Entry retainer

Not published

No recurring floor published; confirm current scope

Operating history

0 years

At peer median

Documented breadth

6 services

5 industry categories

Evidence confidence

98% · High

291 comparable industry peers

Website traffic

No public estimate

HypeStat · Checked 26 Aug 2026

Traffic context: No defensible current public traffic estimate was recorded for this domain; this field is display-only and does not affect Hub Score. Traffic is display-only and does not affect Hub Score.

Open HypeStat source

Buyer decision brief

Where the public evidence points

iPullRank qualifies through current official material establishing a New York City base and 2014 founding, a detailed traditional and AI-search service model, named current leaders and three prominently published outcome examples. The current about page names four leaders but does not present them as the complete company roster, so headcount remains unscored. Its productized, deliverable-led model is public, but exact dollar pricing is not; the old $15,000 seed price and 20-50 team band have therefore been removed.

Official company material establishes a New York City base and 2014 founding

Current service model spans traditional and AI search

Current anonymized cases publish revenue and recovery figures

Relative context

How iPullRank compares

Compared with 291 United States profiles sharing at least one documented industry.

MeasureCompanyPeer median
Entry retainer floorNot published$1.8k/mo
Years operating0Not published
Hub Score v2.05962
Evidence confidence98%95%

Peer comparisons are computed from the current directory dataset, not external market estimates.

Documented services

Linked capabilities are included only when documented in the company research record.

Documented industries

Industry inclusion signals public experience, not exclusive specialisation.

Verified profile evidence

Products and operating claims

First-party case evidence

Published client outcomes

Not independently audited

Transparent scoring

Why Hub Score v2.0 is 59

Operating resilience

3/15

3 points under 3 years; 6 at 3-5; 9 at 6-10; 11 at 11-15; 13 at 16-20; 15 at 21+ years.

Delivery capability

22/25

A monotonic diminishing-return curve: 1 service = 6, 2 = 10, 3 = 14, 4 = 17, 5 = 20, 6 = 22, 7+ = 25.

Sector evidence

25/25

Industry coverage contributes 10, 14, 16 or 18 points; 1, 2 or 3+ source-linked case studies add 3, 5 or 7 points.

Commercial clarity

9/20

4 for a live site + 6 for a disclosed entry floor + 5 for a stated pricing model + 5 for a specific best-fit client statement.

Delivery capacity

0/15

Team bands map monotonically: 10-20 = 5, 20-50 = 8, 50-150 = 11, 150-250 = 13, 250-500 or 500+ = 15.

The five capability factors total exactly 100. Evidence Confidence is calculated and displayed separately. See sources, guardrails and formulas →

Questions for the sales call

  • Request read-only analytics, Search Console, AI-visibility and revenue-attribution evidence for a comparable client, including absolute baselines, dates and calculation rules.
  • Confirm the complete delivery roster, named leads, monthly capacity and use of contractors; the public four-person leadership section is not a headcount.
  • Obtain a dollar proposal mapping every deliverable, implementation responsibility, term, measurement system and asset-ownership rule.

What this profile does not prove

  • Current team size and recurring dollar price are not public; the old directory estimates were removed.
  • All three selected outcomes are anonymized company-authored summaries rather than independently audited cases.
  • Large revenue figures require buyer-side validation of attribution, incrementality, baseline and the client's own implementation contribution.