Tiger29
A Sioux Falls organic-search specialist founded in 2009, with four named staff members, a published SEO and AI-optimization retainer, and local SEO case material.
Hub Score v2.0
71/100
Developing public profile
Top 20%A narrower capability profile; compare buyer fit and Evidence Confidence.
Tied #63 with 1 other company of 399 listed United States companies.
Entry retainer
$976/mo
35% below peer median; confirm current scope
Operating history
0 years
At peer median
Documented breadth
5 services
5 industry categories
Evidence confidence
100% · High
363 comparable industry peers
Website traffic
No public estimate
HypeStat · Checked 26 Aug 2026
Traffic context: No defensible current public traffic estimate was recorded for this domain; this field is display-only and does not affect Hub Score. Traffic is display-only and does not affect Hub Score.
Open HypeStat sourceBuyer decision brief
Where the public evidence points
Tiger29 qualifies through its current Sioux Falls office, official 2009 founding record, four-person public roster, focused organic, local and generative-search delivery, and transparent current pricing. The comparable floor is the published $976 monthly ongoing charge following a $2,164 first-month setup; a lower $526 maintenance tier applies only after the desired result level and is not treated as the entry program. The public case material is company-authored and mostly anonymized, and some examples omit numeric baselines or raw proof.
Current Sioux Falls office
Transparent $976 monthly ongoing SEO price after setup
Search-specialist positioning with local case evidence
Relative context
How Tiger29 compares
Compared with 363 United States profiles sharing at least one documented industry.
| Measure | Company | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Entry retainer floor | $976/mo | $1.5k/mo |
| Years operating | 0 | Not published |
| Hub Score v2.0 | 71 | 61 |
| Evidence confidence | 100% | 95% |
Peer comparisons are computed from the current directory dataset, not external market estimates.
Documented services
Linked capabilities are included only when documented in the company research record.
Documented industries
Industry inclusion signals public experience, not exclusive specialisation.
Verified profile evidence
Products and operating claims
Sioux Falls office
Current pages publish 3101 West 41st Street, Suite 211, Park Place Center, Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57105.
Tiger29 contact
Founded in 2009
The official about page states that Pete Kleinjan founded Tiger29 in 2009 and discloses strategic outsourcing to United States partners.
Tiger29 about
Four people on the public staff page
The current staff page names Pete Kleinjan, Monique Crawford, Saray Gracia and Maddi Langerock, supporting a 2-10 band but not proving available capacity.
Tiger29 staff
Organic, local and generative search
Current service material covers SEO, AI or generative optimization, Google Business Profile work, onsite and offsite signals, citations, analytics and reporting.
Tiger29 SEO services
Focused SEO program with optional sessions
The company sells an ongoing strategic program plus one-off power hours, listing scans, competitive analysis and review-generation support.
Tiger29 pricing
$976 monthly after $2,164 first-month setup
The current pricing page publishes $2,164 for the first month and $976 per month thereafter under a six-month agreement. A $526 maintenance tier is available only after desired results are reached.
Tiger29 pricing
First-party case evidence
Published client outcomes
Local Law Firm One (identity withheld)
Reported 225% organic-traffic growth and an average 3.5 website leads per month after 12 months
Company-authored anonymous criminal-defense case; phone leads were additional. Absolute traffic and lead baselines and raw analytics are not public.
Open sourceLocal Law Firm Two (identity withheld)
Reported 120% organic-traffic growth and an average 10 website prospects per month after 12 months
Company-authored anonymous appeals-law case. A detailed page also claims more than $36,000 in calculated revenue and 214 first-page keywords over 90 days, but client identity and raw data are withheld.
Open sourceSouth Dakota real-estate agent (identity withheld)
Reported greater intentional-search visibility from aggressive Google Business Profile optimization
Company-authored anonymous local-search case. The public summary does not provide a numeric baseline, time window, lead total or functioning distinct full-case destination.
Open sourceTransparent scoring
Why Hub Score v2.0 is 71
Operating resilience
3/153 points under 3 years; 6 at 3-5; 9 at 6-10; 11 at 11-15; 13 at 16-20; 15 at 21+ years.
Delivery capability
20/25A monotonic diminishing-return curve: 1 service = 6, 2 = 10, 3 = 14, 4 = 17, 5 = 20, 6 = 22, 7+ = 25.
Sector evidence
25/25Industry coverage contributes 10, 14, 16 or 18 points; 1, 2 or 3+ source-linked case studies add 3, 5 or 7 points.
Commercial clarity
20/204 for a live site + 6 for a disclosed entry floor + 5 for a stated pricing model + 5 for a specific best-fit client statement.
Delivery capacity
3/15Team bands map monotonically: 10-20 = 5, 20-50 = 8, 50-150 = 11, 150-250 = 13, 250-500 or 500+ = 15.
The five capability factors total exactly 100. Evidence Confidence is calculated and displayed separately. See sources, guardrails and formulas →
Questions for the sales call
- Request named, read-only Search Console, analytics, Business Profile and CRM evidence for a comparable recent account, with absolute baselines and lead-quality records.
- Confirm which of the four listed staff and disclosed US outsourcing partners will perform strategy, content, technical work and link or citation activity, plus monthly hours and client load.
- Confirm the $2,164 setup, $976 monthly scope, six-month term, maintenance eligibility, cancellation rules, content volume, tooling and ownership of accounts and assets.
What this profile does not prove
- The $976 floor excludes the $2,164 first-month setup, and the lower maintenance price is not available at program entry.
- All selected outcomes are company-authored, anonymous and not independently audited.
- The real-estate example lacks numeric results and a working distinct full-case page; the law-firm pages omit raw analytics and absolute baselines.