Independent profileReviewed Aug 26, 2026

Cadence SEO

A Gilbert search-marketing company founded by Christy Olsen and Kevin McLauchlin, with a broad named specialist roster, month-to-month engagements and unusually detailed technical, ecommerce and B2B case studies.

Gilbert, AZBest for Ecommerce, SaaS and B2B teams that want a search-led partner with technical depth, content execution and source-rich reporting

Hub Score v2.0

64/100

Limited public profile

Top 40%

The structured capability record is narrow; verify fit before shortlisting.

Tied #130 with 16 other companies of 399 listed United States companies.

Entry retainer

Not published

No recurring floor published; confirm current scope

Operating history

Not published

Founding year not published

Documented breadth

11 services

4 industry categories

Evidence confidence

95% · High

359 comparable industry peers

Website traffic

No public estimate

HypeStat · Checked 26 Aug 2026

Traffic context: No defensible current HypeStat visit estimate was found for this domain; this display-only field does not affect Hub Score. Traffic is display-only and does not affect Hub Score.

Open HypeStat source

Buyer decision brief

Where the public evidence points

Cadence SEO has the richest current case documentation in the Arizona set. The Gilbert company names its co-founders and a broad specialist roster, describes month-to-month relationships and publishes connected work across technical SEO, content, authority, digital PR, analytics, paid media and AI search. Its newer cases add comparison dates and limitations, but the company does not publish an exact founding year, complete employee count or comparable monthly price, so those inputs remain unknown.

Publishes current case studies with baselines, comparison periods, methods and explicit limitations

Technical SEO, content, authority, digital PR, analytics, paid search and AI-search visibility are connected in one documented process

Current public roster names specialists across strategy, accounts, development, content, paid media and AI work

Relative context

How Cadence SEO compares

Compared with 359 United States profiles sharing at least one documented industry.

MeasureCompanyPeer median
Entry retainer floorNot published$1.5k/mo
Years operatingNot publishedNot published
Hub Score v2.06460
Evidence confidence95%95%

Peer comparisons are computed from the current directory dataset, not external market estimates.

Documented services

Linked capabilities are included only when documented in the company research record.

Documented industries

Industry inclusion signals public experience, not exclusive specialisation.

Verified profile evidence

Products and operating claims

First-party case evidence

Published client outcomes

Not independently audited

Transparent scoring

Why Hub Score v2.0 is 64

Operating resilience

0/15

3 points under 3 years; 6 at 3-5; 9 at 6-10; 11 at 11-15; 13 at 16-20; 15 at 21+ years.

Delivery capability

25/25

A monotonic diminishing-return curve: 1 service = 6, 2 = 10, 3 = 14, 4 = 17, 5 = 20, 6 = 22, 7+ = 25.

Sector evidence

25/25

Industry coverage contributes 10, 14, 16 or 18 points; 1, 2 or 3+ source-linked case studies add 3, 5 or 7 points.

Commercial clarity

14/20

4 for a live site + 6 for a disclosed entry floor + 5 for a stated pricing model + 5 for a specific best-fit client statement.

Delivery capacity

0/15

Team bands map monotonically: 10-20 = 5, 20-50 = 8, 50-150 = 11, 150-250 = 13, 250-500 or 500+ = 15.

The five capability factors total exactly 100. Evidence Confidence is calculated and displayed separately. See sources, guardrails and formulas →

Questions for the sales call

  • Request the actual monthly fee and a proposal separating strategy, implementation, content, authority work, paid media and analytics.
  • Confirm which named specialists will work on the account and whether any writing, development, outreach or reporting is subcontracted.
  • Ask for raw baseline and comparison exports behind a relevant case, including absolute conversions and attribution rules.

What this profile does not prove

  • The official site does not publish an exact founding year or complete employee count, so tenure and capacity remain unscored.
  • Two selected cases anonymize the client and use large percentage gains without publishing the absolute starting values.
  • All case outcomes are company-published, client-specific results and are not independently audited or predictive of another engagement.